Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 199.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, getting an 88.5 score against 78.3. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is an older and just a little bit heavier phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, but Samsung made it thinner anyway. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has Android 11.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit worse pixel quantity per inch in the screen, a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit smaller display. Galaxy Z Flip features a better storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, although it has a back camera with a much lower resolution and a lot smaller sensor which offers a way worse photo and video quality, they both have a same size aperture.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52 percent larger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.