Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 199.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is way better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10's 78.3 global score. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding OS features. Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is notably heavier but thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and both were only released with a couple months difference.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a better memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has a much less MP resolution camera, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a larger back camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a little better battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.