Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-28 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, with an 88.1 score against 78.2. Apple iPhone X is an way older device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, but Apple could make it a bit lighter and just a little thinner. The iPhone X has a superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a slightly better screen than iPhone X, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a bit larger screen and much more brightness. IPhone X counts with much more memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has more internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a much longer battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2716mAh. IPhone X has just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a back camera with a way lower resolution, they both have the same camera aperture.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone X, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.