Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-28 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a general score of 80.2, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's general score of 78.2. Although the Google Pixel is noticeably older and just a bit thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, it's design is still extremely lighter. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has more internal memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2770mAh. Google Pixel features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution back camera and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking photos or video in poorly lited situations.
Although Google Pixel is a better device, it is more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Google Pixel, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.