Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-28 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's 78.2 general score. The Google Pixel 3 body is a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, even though it was released 3 years before. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bigger screen.
Google Pixel 3 has just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Google Pixel 3 features as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, both have the same 64 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72% more battery size. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a back facing camera with a much worse resolution, they both have a same size camera aperture.
The Google Pixel 3 not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.