Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-28 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a score of 80.7, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's general score of 78.2. Even though Google Pixel 3 XL is much older and just a little heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, it's body is still a little thinner. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a little inferior count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little larger screen. Google Pixel 3 XL's memory for applications and games is just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S one, they have exactly the same internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a lot less MP resolution back camera, they both have a F1.8 aperture. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3430mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 3 XL is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.