Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-28 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, getting a 78.8 score against 78.2. The Google Pixel 3a design is just a little bit thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it was released many years before. These phones use the same Android 11 operating system, so they should give you very similar OS features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a just a little lower display density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit bigger display.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a lot less MP camera, they both have the same aperture. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S and the Google Pixel 3a both have quite similar storage to install games and applications, they have exactly the same internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 3a is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.