Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-28 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's global score of 78.2. Despite of the fact that Google Pixel 4 is older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, it's body is just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter. Google Pixel 4 counts with a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a little inferior amount of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bigger screen. Google Pixel 4 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S both count with incredibly similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have equal 64 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a camera in the back with way less MP resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.