Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-28 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, with an 82.9 score against 78.2. Google Pixel 4 XL's construction is just a bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, but it's a bit heavier and was released just 18 months before. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and 6 GB of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has just a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a quite worse pixels density and a lot lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bigger screen. The Google Pixel 4 XL's storage capacity to install applications and games is very similar to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S one, both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a way worse 12.2 megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with greater battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 35 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.