Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-28 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, with a overall score of 82.9 against 78.2. These phones have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that. Google Pixel 4a's body is just a bit thinner and a lot lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, even when they were released with only 8 months difference.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit bigger display. The Google Pixel 4a features a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. Both have 8 CPU cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4a features much more storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3140mAh.
The Google Pixel 4a shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a way lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better images and video in low-light situations.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. If you want to save some money, you can get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.