Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-28 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's 78.2 general score. The Google Pixel 5 construction is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although both of them were only released with a few months difference. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a little bit lower pixel number per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit bigger display.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Google Pixel 5 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a back facing camera with way less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better photography and videos in low-light environments.
Google Pixel 5 features much more memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features better battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4080mAh.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.