Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-04-28 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, getting a overall score of 82.5 against 78.2. Even though the LG V30S ThinQ is notably older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, it's body is thinner and lighter. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS, but LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has Android 11 version, providing you some nice extra features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a little more vivid screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a little inferior count of pixels per screen inch and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a quite bigger display. LG V30S ThinQ features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V30S ThinQ has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. Both of them have 8 cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a very superior battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The LG V30S ThinQ captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower 16 MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, else you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.