Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 13 |
| 2021-04-28 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Interstellar Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, having an 83.4 score against 78.2. Both phones in this comparison come with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has the newer 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has Android 11, so it provides some additional features. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a newer phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it's a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and the same brightness, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S also counts with a quite greater screen density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has 192 GB more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a camera in the back with way less mega pixels resolution, they both have the same diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.