Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-28 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, getting a overall score of 87.1 against 78.2. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is noticeably newer than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's, although it is a bit heavier and a little thicker. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has Android 11.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with way more brightness and a little larger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has 448 GB more internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a much lower 50 mega-pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in low light environments. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a bit superior battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.