Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-28 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, having a overall score of 80.7 against 78.2. Even being the best in this comparison review, the Motorola One Vision design is older, just a bit heavier and a bit thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S and Motorola One Vision count with very similar processors, and although the Motorola One Vision has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a little more vivid screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite larger screen. The Motorola One Vision counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a lot less MP back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photography and video.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.