Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-28 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, getting an 85.5 score against 78.2. Although the Galaxy A51 is older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, it's body is a little lighter and just a little thinner. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should provide the user all the same operating system features.
Samsung Galaxy A51 features a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy A51 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos and a back facing camera with a lot lower 48 MP resolution. The Galaxy A51 has a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.