Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-28 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S is a bit better than the Galaxy A70, getting a 78.2 score against 76.9. Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S is just a bit thicker than Galaxy A70, it's just a little lighter and extremely newer. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has 11 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S and the Samsung Galaxy A70 have quite similar processors, both have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S also counts with a just a bit higher amount of pixels in each inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking images or videos in poorly lited environments. The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a bit better battery life than Galaxy A70, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.