Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-28 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's 78.2 general score. The Galaxy A71 5G UW design has the same thickness than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, but it's a bit heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has Android 11.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S also counts with a just a little greater pixels density.
Galaxy A71 5G UW takes much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. Both of them have the same resolution back-facing camera and the same aperture. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy A71 5G UW, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.