Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-28 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 229.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, having a overall score of 97.6 against 78.2. Both devices we compare here work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has Android 11 version. Galaxy Fold's body is thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, but it is incredibly heavier and was released a little bit further than a year before.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a better looking screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater display pixel density.
Galaxy Fold features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has 448 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Fold has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a much worse 12 MP resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and videos.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14% larger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.