Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-28 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note5 has a score of 80.2, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's 78.2 global score. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Note5 is notably older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, it's construction is just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a bit worse pixel number per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bigger display.
Galaxy Note5 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S both feature incredibly similar memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, they have exactly the same internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S and the Samsung Galaxy Note5 both count with incredibly similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy Note5 takes just a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and video in poorly lited situations and a lot less megapixels back facing camera. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.