Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-28 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is way better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's 78.2 overall score. Even being the best in this review, we must highlight that it's also older, a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a just a little inferior count of pixels per inch of screen and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures way better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot better 108 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a battery life that is just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S one.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.