Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-04-28 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's score of 78.2. The Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is newer, but just a little bit thicker and way heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has a little bit larger screen, a just a little higher pixel density, a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and way more brightness. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a battery performance that's very similar to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S one.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy S22 Ultra, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.