Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-04-28 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Blue and Red |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a global score of 78.2, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's general score of 77.8. These phones use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has the older 11 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S is a noticeably newer and just a little bit thinner cellphone than Galaxy S5 Sport, but it's heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has 4 lesser cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra GPU. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixels number per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos and a back camera with a way lower resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 79% larger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.