Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-28 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, getting a general score of 81 against 78.2. Both devices we compare here include the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should provide the user the same OS features. Galaxy XCover Pro's body is older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a little greater screen density, a quite bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better images in poorly lited situations. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a much greater memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.