Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-28 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 229.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, getting a score of 88.5 against 78.2. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is an older and just a little heavier device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, but Samsung was able to make it somewhat thinner anyway. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has Android 11.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, a little bit worse screen pixels density and a little smaller screen. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has more internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip has just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a camera in the back with way less mega pixels resolution, they both have a same size aperture.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.