Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Sony |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-04-28 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Compact is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, with a overall score of 79 against 78.2. Even though the Xperia XZ2 Compact is extremely older and thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, it's design is still a little lighter. These phones use Android OS, but Xperia XZ2 Compact has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has Android 11 version, offering a couple additional features and performance optimizations.
Xperia XZ2 Compact has just a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xperia XZ2 Compact features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a really smaller screen, a bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and much lower brightness, it also counts with a little better pixel density.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 400 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a very superior battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2870mAh.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact shoots better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.