Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-28 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 229.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, getting a overall score of 86.6 against 78.2. Although it's the best in this review, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 body is older, heavier and somewhat thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has the previous 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S also counts with a little bit better amount of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 captures much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. Both have a back-facing camera with a 64 megapixels resolution and a F1.8 aperture. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with just a little better battery life than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.