Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-04-28 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| -- | Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's 78.2 overall score. Both phones in our current comparison work with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is a incredibly heavier phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, but they are equally thin.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has a better count of pixels per inch in the display, a quite bigger display, a lot brighter display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a much less megapixels back-facing camera and a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing images or video in low-light situations.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra's battery performance is just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.