Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-28 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, with an 87.9 score against 78.2. Both devices in this review have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has Android 11. Although the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a better cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, it must be noted that it is also an older, heavier and just a little thicker cellphone.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S also counts with a brighter display and a bit greater quantity of pixels per display inch.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. Both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light images, they both have a 64 MP back facing camera.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.