Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, with an 80 score against 77.1. The Google Pixel 3 is a a little thinner and noticeably lighter phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a much powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a more vivid display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a much higher resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels, a little higher screen density and a bigger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.