Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has an overall score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's overall score of 77.1. The Google Pixel 3a is a way lighter phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, but they are equally thin. Both devices in our current comparison work with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding operating system features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a brighter display than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a way better 2080 x 2400px resolution, a little higher pixels density and a bigger display. The Google Pixel 3a has a very superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 67% bigger battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a way better 108 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.