Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, with a 78.9 score against 77.1. The Google Pixel 3a XL body has the same thickness than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, but it's lighter. Both of these devices include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a much better display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a way better resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels, a quite greater pixel density and a little larger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a much bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a much greater hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a lot better 108 MP resolution back facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.