Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's score of 77.1. The Google Pixel 4 is a lighter phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, but they have the same thickness. Google Pixel 4 features a much greater performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. They have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a brighter display than Google Pixel 4, because it has a much better resolution of 2080 x 2400, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a larger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting images and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a camera with a way higher 108 MP resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a very superior storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.