Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, getting a global score of 82.9 against 77.1. Google Pixel 4 XL's design has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, but it is a little bit lighter. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a bit better display than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a slightly better 2080 x 2400 resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a very superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G shoots way better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photos or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.