Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's overall score of 77.1. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Google Pixel 4a is a incredibly lighter phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, but both are equally thin.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a better looking display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a just a bit higher amount of pixels in each screen inch, a higher 2080 x 2400 resolution and a larger screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a back facing camera with lot more MP.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 59% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.