Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, getting a general score of 89 against 77.1. Google Pixel 5's construction is a lot lighter and just a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. The Google Pixel 5 has an extremely better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a sharper display than Google Pixel 5, because it has a just a little greater screen pixels density, a higher 2080 x 2400 resolution and a quite larger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with superior battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4080mAh. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G takes much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller aperture and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.