Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| -- | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 474 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, getting a general score of 77.7 against 77.1. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the HTC One M9 has an older 5.0 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has Android 11 version. The HTC One M9 is a extremely lighter but thicker cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G.
The HTC One M9 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G both count with incredibly similar displays, although the HTC One M9 has a lot lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, a lot smaller display and a little lower pixel density. HTC One M9 counts with a lot better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64 bits processing unit.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a superior camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a bigger camera aperture to capture better images in poorly lited situations.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.