Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 474 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is just a bit better than HTC U Ultra, with a 77.1 score against 77. Despite being the best cellphone in our current comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is a heavier and a little thicker cellphone than HTC U Ultra. HTC U Ultra has a much better performing processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a bit more vivid screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 2080 x 2400px and a larger screen. The HTC U Ultra counts with more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the HTC U Ultra also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G takes way better photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a much better resolution camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a much longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 67% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.