Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 6.12 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, getting a 79.9 score against 77.1. The Galaxy A25 5G is a a little thicker but a bit lighter cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A25 5G has a newer 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has Android 11.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because it has a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels, a bit better screen pixel density, a little bit bigger display and a little bit brighter screen. The Galaxy A25 5G has a bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB, the Galaxy A25 5G also has 64 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy A25 5G's CPU is very similar to the processing unit in Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G and Galaxy A25 5G both count with really similar battery durations. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.