Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has an overall score of 77.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy A5 (2017)'s global score of 75.8. Even being the best phone we are comparing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is a a lot heavier and a bit thicker phone than Galaxy A5 (2017). The Galaxy A5 (2017) features an extremely better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a much better screen than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a way better resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels, a larger display and a quite greater screen density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a F1.9 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a lot more MP camera in the back and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.