Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's 77.1 overall score. The Galaxy A50 design is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a bit greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen, a better 2080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a lot better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a much better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much more MP back camera and a lot better video quality.
The Galaxy A50 features a little bit more memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows 512 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.