Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's 77.1 global score. Galaxy A50s is a a bit thinner and lighter cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A50s has older 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has Android 11.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a quite higher screen pixel density, a higher 2080 x 2400 resolution and a quite larger screen. The Galaxy A50s has a little bit more storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has an external memory slot that admits 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a really superior processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 6 GB RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G takes a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light situations and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.