Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, with a global score of 85.5 against 77.1. Galaxy A51's design is a little thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. These phones use the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should provide you identical operating system features.
Galaxy A51 has a way better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A51, because it has a bit more pixels per inch of screen, a little bit larger display and a better 2080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy A51 has a slightly bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features greater battery lifetime than Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a back camera with a much higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.