Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's 77.1 overall score. The Galaxy A52 design is a little thicker but just a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. The Galaxy A52 features a much greater hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM amount.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a just a bit better count of pixels per inch of screen, a little bit bigger screen and a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400. Galaxy A52 has a camera that's very similar to the camera in Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although the Galaxy A52 has a worse video resolution and a back facing camera with lot less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy A52 features a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB, the Galaxy A52 also has more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A52, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.