Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, getting a overall score of 91.1 against 77.1. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect. The Samsung Galaxy A52s construction is a little lighter but a little bit thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G.
The Galaxy A52s has a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 6 GB RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a more vivid display than Galaxy A52s, because it has a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels, a just a bit higher display density and a bit larger screen.
The Galaxy A52s has a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, and although they both have a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB, the Galaxy A52s also has more internal memory. The Galaxy A52s and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G count with really similar cameras, because although the Galaxy A52s has a way lower resolution back-facing camera and a worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and video.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A52s, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.