Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70, getting a global score of 77.1 against 76.9. Even being the best device in this review, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is a just a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker device than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a more recent 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a much greater processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a better looking screen than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a higher 2080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit better display pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A70, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a much better camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.