Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, with a global score of 85.2 against 77.1. The Galaxy A9 (2018) is a a little bit thinner and a little lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a more vivid display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a much better 2080 x 2400 resolution, a bit bigger screen and a just a bit greater pixel amount in each inch in the display.
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a very superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy A9 (2018) has slightly more storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features better battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3800mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.