Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's 77.1 overall score. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite worse pixel count per screen inch, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 2080 x 2400. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much greater processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has more storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a bigger camera aperture and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery life is very similar to Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.