Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is slightly better than the Galaxy S7 Active, having a 77.1 score against 75.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's body is a little heavier but thinner than Galaxy S7 Active. Galaxy S7 Active features a much faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores.
Galaxy S7 Active counts with a display that's just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's screen, because although the Galaxy S7 Active has a quite lower resolution of 1440 x 2560px, way less brightness and a much smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with greater battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G captures a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a much more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.