Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a general score of 78.1, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's overall score of 77.1. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is a a little bit thinner and notably lighter device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. These phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has 8.0 Oreo version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has Android 11 version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a bit lower pixel count per display inch, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels and a larger screen. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a really superior performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a way higher 108 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.